Contoh Artikel Beserta Beberapa Tensesnya

 

The Removal of fuel subsidies kills community

Currently, all the cost of basic necessity is rising. 1.It happened after our president decided to revoke the fuel subsidy.  This policy causes a lot of pros and cons in society. 2. The pro side that agrees on the president’s decision assumes that the policy which has been made is right. However, they do not know that in fact many problems occur as a result of this policy, especially among the middle and small class communities. Through this paper the author argues that the removal fuel subsidy policy kills societies in medium and small class. To strengthen the argument, here are two paragraphs discuss why the cost increase of fuel oil can kill small and medium class in society.

The first reason why this policy can kill the society is the rising of fuel price causes a domino effect. 3. The increasing of fuel cost will be followed by the increasing of basic needs or other life’s cost. 4. The increasing of the living cost which is not followed by salary improvement makes them have to think hard to skimp. Surely they cannot eliminate their basic needs so that they find it difficult to get it.

The last reason is the increasing of fuel cost kills small-independent business. 5. An Independent-small business that has low capital like meatballs businesses, restaurants, and other small businesses is threatened with bankruptcy. 6. The increasing of fuel prices would force them to increase their product prices to avoid losses. 7. However, by increasing their product price will make their income low instead of give benefit for them. 8. Now, citizens prefer to spend their money for more important things like education cost, other basic needs and etc.

Therefore, the government policy in removing fuel subsidies is not the solution in creating welfare for its society. However, this policy could kill middle and lower class in society by the increasing of basic needs cost and kill small-independent business.

TENSESSNYA :

1. It happened after our president decided to revoke the fuel subsidy : S + Tobe + V2 = Past Tense

2.  The pro side that agrees on the president’s decision assumes that the policy which has been made is right. However, they do not know that in fact many problems occur as a result of this policy, especially among the middle and small class communities : S + HAS / HAVE + V3 + O ATAU S + HAS / HAVE + BEEN + V3 = SIMPLE PREFECT TENSE

3. The increasing of fuel cost will be followed by the increasing of basic needs or other life’s cost : S + Will + V1 + O =  Future Tense

4. The increasing of the living cost which is not followed by salary improvement makes them have to think hard to skimp : S + HAS / HAVE + V3 + O ATAU S + HAS / HAVE + BEEN + V3 = SIMPLE PREFECT TENSE

5. An Independent-small business that has low capital like meatballs businesses, restaurants, and other small businesses is threatened with bankruptcy : S + HAS / HAVE + V3 + O ATAU S + HAS / HAVE + BEEN + V3 = SIMPLE PREFECT TENSE

6. The increasing of fuel prices would force them to increase their product prices to avoid losses : S + WOULD / SHOULD + V1 + O ATAU S + WOULD / SHOULD + BE + V3 = FUTURE PAST

7. However, by increasing their product price will make their income low instead of give benefit for them : S + Will + V1 + O =  Future Tense

8. Now, citizens prefer to spend their money for more important things like education cost, other basic needs and etc :  S + V1 + O = Simple Present Tense

sumber : http://lilyashlihah.blogspot.co.id/2015/03/artikel-bahasa-inggris-dengan-tenses.html